AHMED HUSSAIN S/O BASHASAB MUDGAL v. TECHNICAL ASSISTANT TO DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND
WP/114209/2015 · 2025-11-24
Anant Ramanath Hegde
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50258 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50258 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16271 WP No. 114209 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 114209 OF 2015 (KLR-RR/SUR)
BETWEEN:
AHMED HUSAIN S/O BASHASAB MUDGAL, AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC: MECHANIC, R/O: KUMBAR ONI, KOPPAL, TQ: AND DIST: KOPPAL-583 231. & PETITIONER (BY SRI. K.L. PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. TECHNICAL ASSISTANT TO DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, KOPPAL, D.C. OFFICE, HOSAPET ROAD, KOPPAL-583 231. 2. FURKHAN AHMED S/O KHALEEL AHMED DOCTOR, AGE: 30 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: DIDDIKERA ONI, KOPPAL, DIST: KOPPAL-583 231. 3. TAHASILDHAR KOPPAL, TAHSILDAR OFFICE, KOPPAL-583 231, DIST: KOPPAL. 4. M.K. RAJUR, AGE. MAJOR (CORRECT AGE NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER), TALUKA SURVEYOR, LAND SURVEY DEPARTMENT, TAHSILDAR OFFICE, KOPPAL-583 231, PRESENTLY WORKING AT TAHSILDAR OFFICE, GANGAVATHI-583 227, DIST: KOPPAL. 5. SRI. KEMPEGOUDA, AGE. MAJOR (CORRECT AGE NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER),
CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.11.27 12:54:56 +0530
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16271 WP No. 114209 of 2015
RETIRED TALUKA SURVEYOR, THEN TALUKA SURVEYOR, PRESENT STAYING AT: SHANKAR NAGAR, 3RD CROSS, M.B. NO.1029, MANDYA. 6. SHIVAKANT JIRDEKAR, AGE. MAJOR (CORRECT AGE NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER), SUPERVISOR TECHNICAL, TAHSIL OFFICE KOPPAL, PRESENTLY WORKING AT SSUPR SECTION DHARWAD, MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, DHARWAD, DIST: DHARWAD-580 002. 7. KOPPAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KOPPAL, TQ: AND DIST: KOPPAL-583 231. & RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. MALA B. BHUTE, AGA FOR R1 AND R3;
SRI. F.V. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. RAJASHEKHAR R. GUNJALLI, ADVOCATE FOR R7;
NOTICE TO R4 TO R6 IS SERVED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE ANY OTHER ORDER OR ANY DIRECTION OR ANY WRIT IN THE NATURE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER PASSED IN APPEAL BEFORE THE RESPONDENT NO.1 AT NO./Bhu.Uu.Ni/Tan/Appeal 22/2013-14, DATED 04.02.2015 AT ANNEXURE-L; ISSUE ANY ORDER OR ANY DIRECTION OR ANY WRIT IN THE NATURE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE CORRIGENDUM DATED 23.02.2015 IN NO./Bhu.Uu.Ni/Tan/Appeal 22/2013-14, PASSED IN APPEAL BEFORE RESPONDENT NO.1 AT ANNEXURE-L1 AND ISSUE ANY ORDER OR ANY DIRECTION OR ANY WRIT IN THE NATURE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER AT ANNEXURE-M PASSED BY KOPPAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY R7 AT REF.
NO.Konapra/Tantrika/Vi,Ra/30/2015-16 DATED 18.04.2015 CANCELING THE APPROVAL OF LAY OUT PLAN. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 8B9 GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16271 WP No. 114209 of 2015
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE)
It is noticed from the impugned orders that there is a direction to conduct the resurvey based on the sale deed. It appears that there is a confusion relating to the boundaries in the sale deed. 2. Under these circumstances, this Court does not find any reason to interfere with the impugned orders. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. 4. Since the impugned orders direct fresh survey, the same shall be conducted in accordance with law. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE
CHS CT:BCK LIST NO.: 3 SL NO.: 11