IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Ik FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 721 OF 2025 Between: Dasari Mariyadasu, S/o. Dasari Mohana Rao, Occ: Auto Driver, R/o. H.No. 12- 41, Christianpet, Tadepalli Guntur District, AP. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of AP, Rep., by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat (T.S), Velagapudi. The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Collector Office Road Guntur, AP Guntur. The Station House Officer, Tadepalle Police Station, Tadepalle, vanga Devadasu, S/o. Krishna, Age 47 years, R/o.Polkampadu, Tadepalli Guntur, AP. 2. 3. 4. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to grant an order or direction or writ, more so in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondent No. 3 in calling the petitioners to police station and threatening the petitioners to settle the civil disputes with respondent No.4 and trying to Implicate in false criminal cases as illegal, arbitrary, highhanded, violative of principles of natural justice apart from being violative of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and violative of provisions of Criminal Procedure Code and consequent direct the respondent No. 3 to not to interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioners wittiout following due process of. ..>-V lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 3 not to call the petitioners to police station, further to not to interferewith the civil disputes. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI NALABOLU VENKATA PAVANKUMAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 : SRI V. FAROOK, ASST.GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : NONE APPEARED The Court made the following; ORDER ■4- [3396] APHC010606522024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 721/2025 Between: 1.DASARI MARIYADASU, S/0 DASARI MOHANA RAO,OCC- AUTO DRIVER R/0 H.NO. 12-41, CHRISTIANPET, TADEPALLI GUNTUR DISTRICT, AP. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF AP, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT (T.S), VELAGAPUDI. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, COLLECTOR OFFICE ROAD, GUNTUR, AP GUNTUR 3.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TADEPALLE POLICE STATION, TADEPALLE, 4.VANGA DEVADASU, S/0 KRISHNA, AGE-47YEARS R/O.POLKAMPADU, TADEPALLI GUNTUR, AP . ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.NALABOLU VENKATA PAVANKUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): T-^,' 2 a* 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer; “....to grant an order or direction or writ, more so in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondent No. 3 in calling the petitioner to police station and threatening the petitioner to settle the civil disputes with respondent No.4 and trying to Implicate in false criminal cases as illegal, arbitrary, highhanded, violative of principles of natural justice apart from being violative of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and violative of provisions of Criminal Procedure Code and consequent direct the respondent No. 3 to not to interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioner without following due process of and pass.... Heard Sri Nalabolu Venkata Pavana Kumar, learned counsel for 2. the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police 3. are calling the petitioner to the police station and threatening the petitioner to settle the civil disputes with respondent No.4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that Court 4. may pass appropriate orders. Considering the submissions made, this Writ Petition is disposed 5. of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil dispute and the police are further directed to follow due process of law, if any crime is registered against the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. V" ■ 4 ■4^ As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any shall stand closed. Sd/- U.SRl DEVI ASSISTANT REGipRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, State of AP, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Collector Office Road Guntur, AP Guntur. 3. The Station House Officer, Tadepalle Police Station, Tadepalle. 4. One CC to Sri Nalabolu Venkata Pavankumar, Advocate [OPUC] 5, Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 6. Three C.D. Copies. Cnr ♦ -- HIGH COURT DATED: 10/01/2025 ORDER WP.No.721 of 2025 ^ 2 6 JUN 2025 ^^SsCurront Secti2j:k'''W rn Cf* DISPOSING THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS