Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50248 (AP)

M SRINIVASA NAIK v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/553/2025 · 2025-05-05

A Hari Haranadha Sarma, B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

\ [3527 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) ^ TUESDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY B TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE & PRESENT ^ THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN ♦ ^"4 o AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT PETITION NO: 553 OF 2025 Between: M. Srinivasa Naik, S/0 Krishna Naik, aged 40 years, Occ: Ex-Home Guard No. 531 (Removed), R/0 Brahmanagiri Math (Post and Mandal), YSR Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh ...Petitioner/s AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, A.P Secretariate, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 2. The Director General of Police, Mangalagiri, DGP Office, Amaravathi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh 3. The Superintendent of Police, YSR District, Andhra Pradesh-516001 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent authorities in not implementing the order of OA. 8770/2013 Dated 13/12/2013 in is as may Reinstating the petitioner as Home Guard in the Home Department Illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 15, 16, 19, 21 and 300A of the Indian Constitution and principles of natural justice and consequently to direct the Respondent authorities to implement the order of OA. 8770/2013 gate4J3/12/2013 in reinstating the petitioner into services as Home Guard ^nce with the law. &2025 ii^on under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an interim order or direction directing the Respondent authorities to implement the order of OA. 8770/2013 Dated 13/12/2013 in reinstating the petitioner into services as Home Guard in accordance with the law; Counsel for the Petitioner:M/s. NALLANAGULA LALITHA SREE Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: APHC010010532025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3527] TUESDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT PETITION NO: 553/2025 Between: M Srinivasa Naik ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT{S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NALLANAGULA LALITHA SREE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR SERVICES I I / 2 HBKMJ & HAHHS,J W.P.No.553 of 2025 The Court made the following: ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Krishna Mohan) No representation for the petitioner, inspite of posting the matter under the caption “for dismissal”. 2. On earlier occasions also i.e. on 18.03.2025, 01.04.2025 and 29.04.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. In view of the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to 3. costs. As a sequel. Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// f SEC OFFICER To 1. One CC to M/s. NALLANAGULA LALITHA SREE Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES I, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3. Three CD Copies HIGH COURT . -t DATED:06/05/2025 ORDER ^ n JUN 2025 \ ^^urwntSectigfc^ WP.No.553 of 2025 CO <3\ DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR DEFAULT