Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:19758
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2506 of 2022 1 - Ajaj Qureshi S/o Abdul Aziz Qureshi Aged About 42 Years R/o Aman Nagar, Mowa, Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Tahsildar Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Municipal Corporation Raipur, Through Its Commissioner Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Shailesh Tiwari, Advocate For State/Respondent No.1 to 3 : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.4 : Mr. Sandeep Dubey, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice
Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order on Board 30/04/2025
1. Heard Mr. Shailesh Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. Anuja Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer for the RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.05.06 18:54:35 +0530
2 State/respondents No.1 to 3 as well as Mr. Sandeep Dubey,
learned counsel for the respondent No.4.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that the petitioner is having alternative remedy under the law and without availing the same the petitioner has approached this Court.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant writ petition has been filed only for a direction to the respondents for taking decision upon claim of the petitioner.
4. Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that subject to due verification and scrutiny of the claim of the petitioner, appropriate steps shall be taken at the earliest within a period of 60 days.
5. In view of the above submission made by the parties, the petitioner is directed to pursue his remedy available under the law before the concerned Tehsildar, Raipur, as it is evident from Annexure P/6. The respondents are directed to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner within an outer limit of 45 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.
6. With the aforesaid observation(s) and direction(s), the present petition is disposed of.
Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ravi Mandavi