BHIM SAIN v. REGISTRAR FIRM AND SOCIETIES HARYANA AND ORS
CWP/34877/2025 · 2026-03-20
Jagmohan Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5024 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5024 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
109 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.34877 of 2025 Date of Decision: 20.03.2026 Bhim Sain
….Petitioner vs.
Registrar, Firm and Societies, Haryana and others
….Respondents
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. P.S.Doon, Advocate for Mr. P.R.Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Akshit Pathania, AAG, Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1. The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to decide representations dated 25.09.2025 (Annexures P-9 and P-10) as per Section 40 of the Haryana Registration & Regulation of Societies Act, 2012 (for short “2012 Act”).
2. On 04.02.2026, the following order was passed:-
“ Counsel for the petitioner states that elections to Dada Chhajju Peer Dharm Sabha were held on 31.08.2025 and representations dated 08.09.2025, Annexure P-4, and 25.09.2025, Annexures P-9 and P-12, were submitted questioning the mode and manner of conducting the elections. Counsel states that these representations be treated as a petition under Section 40 PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2026.03.20 05:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
of the Haryana Registration and Regulation of Societies Act, 2012 and be decided accordingly. Advance copy of the petition has been served upon the official respondents. On asking of the Court, Mr. Deepak Vashisth, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana puts in appearance on their behalf and requests for short accommodation to get instructions. List on 16.02.2026.”
3. Learned State counsel submits that competent authority would pass an approriate order treating the present petition as representation of the petitioner under Section 40 of 2012 Act.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to the aforesaid arrangement.
5. In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition standsdisposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 20.03.2026 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2026.03.20 05:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document