Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5024 (JHR)

RAKESH KUMAR YADAV ALIAS RAKESH ALIAS RAKESH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./993/2025 · 2025-02-13

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 993 of 2025 ------ Rakesh Kumar Yadav @ Rakesh @ Rakesh Kumar, aged about 28 years, son of Ajay Kumar Yadav, resident of Quarter No.2-050 Street -05 Sector -2/c, P.O. & P.S.-Bokaro Steel City, Dist.-Bokaro, Jharkhand … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Hemant Kr. Shikarwar, Advocate : Mr. Aman Deep, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anup P. Topno, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 13.02.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with B.S. City P.S. Case No.229 of 2024 registered under sections 126(2)/115(2)/118(1)/109/117(2)/303(2)/ 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder the informant. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the alleged injury sustained by the victim is simple in nature. It is then submitted that the petitioner had no intention to kill anybody and the alleged assault was by hard and blunt object. It is then submitted that the genesis of the occurrence was use of derogatory words. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 19 of the anticipatory bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs. 10,000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Bokaro, in connection with B.S. City P.S. Case No.229 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj-