Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5024 (GAU)

M/s Naney Enterprise and Anr v. The State of AP and 3 Ors

WP(C)/568/2024 · 2025-04-21

Manish Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040016642024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/568/2024 M/s Naney Enterprise and Anr Bosididum, Near Welcome Gate Pasighat, represented by its proprietor Shri Pakyom Koyu, Son of Tapak Koyu, PO and PS Pasigaht, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Kojum Koyu Age: Occupation : Son of Late Karko Koyu power of Attorney holder of Naney Enterprise permanent resident of Koyu Village PO and PS Koyu East Siang District Arunachal Pradesh and presently residing at D Sector Naharlagun PO and PS Naharlagun Papum Pare District Arunachal Prades VERSUS The State of AP and 3 Ors through the Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, block -II 3rd Floor, Rom No. 316, Civil Secretariat, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh. 2:The Chief Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : CZ-B PWD Pasighat East Siang District PO and PS Pasighat Page No.# 2/2 Arunachal Pradesh. 3:The Superintending Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Basar Civil Circle PWD Basar Leparada District Arunachal Pradesh. 4:The Executive Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : PWD Nari Division Lower Siang District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Rintu Saikia, Idak Bam,Bomchi Taipodia,Limi Bam,Hongmo Ete,Ligam Nochi Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 22-04-2025 Mr. B. Taipodia, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed, as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant