Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50233 (AP)

ALLURI RAGHAVENDRA NAIDU v. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

WP/9742/2024 · 2025-09-22

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010185352024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 9742/2024 Between: 1. ALLURI RAGHAVENDRA NAIDU, S/O. VENKATA SUBBA NAIDU. AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,NATIVE OF POLAMPADU VILLAGE, KALIGIRIMANDAL,PRESENTLY RESIDING IN KOTHAVANGALLU VILLAGE, OF KODAVALURMANDAL S.P.S.R.NELLORE DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, NELLORE TOWN, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KODAVALUR TOWN AND MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DR G V RAVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of Respondents 2 to 4 calling the petitioner to present before the 4th respondent police station from morning to evening every Sunday by affixing his photo in the notice board under the list of suspect persons as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14,19,21 of the Constitution of India and apart from against to the Standing Order 601(Old 701) of A.P. Police Standing Orders and consequently set aside the suspect sheet on the petitioner.” 2 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, by way of a counter affidavit, would submit that no cases are pending against the petitioner. It is further stated that, to curb and curtail the unlawful activities of the Petitioner in the vicinity, Suspect Sheet was opened against the Petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, the cases registered against the Petitioner were ended in acquittal and no cases are pending against him. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is allowed and the Suspect Sheet No.49 on the file of respondent No.4, against the Petitioner is hereby set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:23.09.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.9742 of 2024 Dt.23.09.2025 Asr