Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50232 (AP)

K.B. Thulasiram, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/15079/2021 · 2025-09-21

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010262592021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 15079/2021 Between: 1. K.B. THULASIRAM,, S/O LATE K.M. BALAKRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCCU BUSINESS, RESIDING AT DOOR NO.3-83, GREAMSPET, CHITTOOR CITY AND MANDAL AND DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH - 517 001. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, II TOWN POLICE STATION, CHITTOOR TOWN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, II TOWN POLICE STATION, CHITTOOR TOWN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more 2 particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 4 and 5 in calling the petitioner to the II Town Police Station, Chittoor Town,and insisting him to make payments to his customers immediately and thus interfering with the civil matters as illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural justice and violation of Articles 14 86 21 of constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents No 4 and 5 not to interfere with the petitioners personal liberty and his day to day life and business activities and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents No 4 and 5 not to interfere with the petitioner's personal liberty and his day-to-day life and business activities pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH B R P SEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 15079/2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: <…to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 4 and 5 in calling the petitioner to the II Town Police Station, Chittoor Town and insisting him to make payments to his customers immediately and thus interfering with the civil matters as illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural justice and violation of Articles 14 & 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents No.4 and 5 not to interfere with the petitioners personal liberty and his day to day life and business activities…= 2. None represented for the petitioner. 3. The present writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the Police not to call the petitioner to the Police Station and interfere in the civil dispute. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes. 5. Recording the same, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 22.09.2025 JLV 4 136 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.15079 of 2021 Dated: 22.09.2025 JLV