Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50225 (AP)

JATLASATHIBABU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/1175/2025 · 2025-02-16

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MAIN CASE No.: Crl.P.No.1175 of 2025 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl.No DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 02. 14.11.2025 Dr.YLR, J I.A.No.1 of 2025 Notice was affected but it was returned along with postal acknowledgment that Respondent No.1 refused to receive it, vide memo dated 11.11.2025 filed by the learned counsel by the Petitioner. There is a delay of 9 days in preferring the Revision. The reason assigned for 9 days delay is that there were compromise talks going on in between the Petitioner and Respondent No1. The reason assigned for delay is convincing and sufficient. Hence, the delay is condoned. I.A.No.1 of 2025 is allowed. ________ Dr.YLR, J Crl.P.No.1175 of 2025 Admit. Issue notice to the respondent No.1. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to take out personal notice on respondent No.1 and file proof to that effect. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. The petitioner/Accused is directed to surrender before the learned Special Magistrate, Anakapalli, within a period of one (01) week from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. On such surrender and filing of an application seeking enlargement on bail, the learned Special Magistrate, Anakapalli, shall release the petitioner on bail, subject to his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Magistrate Anakapalli, on the same day itself. The petitioner shall deposit 20% of the cheque amount with the learned Magistrate within a period of four (04) weeks from this date. Failing to deposit 20% of the cheque amount, the learned Magistrate shall take appropriate steps for recovery of the said amount. And on such deposit the Respondent No.1 is at liberty to withdrawn the same by producing sufficient surety to the satisfaction to the learned Special Magistrate, Anakapalli. Petitioner and Respondent No.1 are directed to appear before the mediation centre. Sri Tata Singaiah Goud, learned Counsel is appointed as learned Mediator in this case. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee is directed to issue necessary proceedings in this regard. Petitioner and Respondent No.1 are directed to appear before the learned Mediator for amicable settlement of the issue. For Mediator’s report, post on 15.12.2025. ________ Dr.YLR, J VTS