Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5022 (MAD)

Gandhi alias Selvam, v. Pappammal (Died) 1. Vijayalakshmi

CMP(MD)/17748/2025 · 2026-03-10

P Vadamalai

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP(MD) NOS. 17748, 17752, & 17753 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI CMP(MD) NOS. 17748, 17752, & 17753 of 2025 IN AS(MD) NO. 31 of 2017 Gandhi @ Selvam Petitioner(s) in all petitions Vs Pappammal (Died) 1.Vijayalakshmi 2.Baskar @ Ganesan Kanakavalli (Died) 3.Indira 4.Priyankadevi 5.Ishwariya (The 4th and 5th Respondents are declared as majors and they are amended as per order in IA 120 of 2014 dated 08.08.2014) Mailammal (Died) 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP(MD) NOS. 17748, 17752, & 17753 of 2025 6.Lakshmi (Died) 7.Bose @ Palanisamy (Died) 8.Subbalakshmi (Died) 9.Nagarajan 10.Karthikeyan 11.Shanmugavel 12.Durgadevi 13.Kumaravel @ Appu 14.P.Santhi 15.P.Selvakalai 16.P.Ramyarevathi 17.P.Shanmugavel Chettiar 18.S.Renuka 19.Gnana Kalai Respondent(s) in all petitions For Petitioner(s) in all petitions : Mr.B.Jameelarasu, Advocate For Respondent(s) in all petitions : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian, Advocate for R17 & R18 R19 – No Appearance 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP(MD) NOS. 17748, 17752, & 17753 of 2025 Common Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are filed to condone the delay of 354 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 8th respondent, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 8th respondent, and to bring on record respondent Nos.17 to 19 as the legal representatives of the deceased 8th respondent and rank them as respondent Nos.17 to 19 in the Appeal Suit in A.S. (MD)No.31 of 2017 on the file of this Court. COMMON ORDER These Civil Miscellaneous Petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 354 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 8th respondent, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 8th respondent, and to bring on record respondent Nos.17 to 19 as the legal representatives of the deceased 8th respondent and rank them as respondent Nos.17 to 19 in the Appeal Suit in A.S. (MD)No.31 of 2017 on the file of this Court. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the common affidavit filed in support of these petitions. 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP(MD) NOS. 17748, 17752, & 17753 of 2025 3. The learned counsel for respondent Nos.17 & 18 has not raised any objection to this petition. 4. The names of the 19th respondent has been printed in the cause list. 5. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit, these Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are allowed. 10-03-2026 (3/3) Note : The Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in the appeal memorandum. mkn 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP(MD) NOS. 17748, 17752, & 17753 of 2025 P.VADAMALAI, J. mkn CMP(MD) NOS. 17748, 17752, & 17753 of 2025 in AS(MD) NO. 31 of 2017 10.03.2026 (3/3) 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis