Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50218 (AP)

Kamatham Balaji, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/6066/2025 · 2025-03-11

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010155642025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 8391/2025 Between: 1. DERANGULA DURGA RAO, S/O. JAI ANDHRA, AGE 55 YEARS, OCC- OFFICE SUBORDINATE, R/O. H.NO.8-29-64123, GADDIPADU, GANESH NAGAR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTORATE OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, ANDHRA PRADESH, VADDESWARAM, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE GUNTUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a direction, an order or a writ more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring that the inaction of the respondent authorities in regularization of the services of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of the India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for minimum time scale and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for Minimum Time Scale and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 C.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed on 25-04-2025 in W.P.No.8391 of 2025 and consequently dismiss the Writ Petition with costs on the grounds of devoid of merits and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VALLEPU JAGADEESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) 2. GP FOR SERVICES I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: <…to issue a direction, an order or a writ more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring that the inaction of the respondent authorities in regularization of the services of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of the India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for minimum time scale and pass…= 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date: 09.03.2026 M K K 258 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH Writ Petition No.8391 of 2025 Dated: 09.03.2026 M K K