SHRI. BIJARAM S/O SAKHARAM KHURSUNGE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. ITS SECRETARY DEPT. OF REVENUE and FOREST , MUMBAI
WP/4115/2019 · 2025-02-12
Shri Nitin W Sambre, Vrushali V Joshi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50209 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50209 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
16-WP-4115-19.odt 1/1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO.4115 OF 2019
Shri Bijaram s/o Sakharam Khursunge, Post Salai Dhaba, Tah. Hingana, Dist. Nagpur -vs- The State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Revenue & Forest, Mantralaya, Mumbai and ors. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders. or directions and the Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shri H. B. Bargat, Advocate for petitioner. Shri S. M. Ghodeswar, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1 to 5.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND MRS VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : February 12, 2025 P. C.
1. Heard Shri Bargat, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that he is a tribal and owner of agricultural land Khasra No.69/1 situated at Mauza Kirmiti, Tah. Hingana, District Nagpur which he is intending to sell to the non-tribal. He has already entered into agreement to that effect on 06/11/2012.
3. According to him, the proposal of the petitioner was forwarded by the Collector, Nagpur to the Divisional Commissioner for grant of permission and the same appears to be pending with the State Government.
4. In this background, we deem it appropriate to dispose of the present petition by directing the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to decide the proposal of the petitioner expeditiously and in any case by 30/04/2025.
5. In view of aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with no
order as to costs. (Mrs Vrushali V. Joshi, J.) (Nitin W. Sambre, J.) Asmita 2025:BHC-NAG:1471-DB