Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5019 (KAR)

SRI VIGNESH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/102643/2023 · 2025-04-24

Jyoti Mulimani

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6800 WP No. 102643 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 102643 OF 2023 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: SRI. VIGNESH S/O VINAYAK ACHARI, AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: CARPENTER, GOPASHITTA, BARNAVADA, TQ: KARWAR, DIST: UTTAR KANNADA. … PETITIONER (BY MISS DIVYA ACHARI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. VENKATESH M. KHARVI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, M.S. BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND SUB DIVISION MAGISTRATE, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SUB-DIVISION KARWAR, TQ: KARWAR, DIST: UTTARA KANNADA-581 301. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TQ: KARWAR, DIST: UTTARA KANNADA-581 301. … RESPONDENT (BY SRI. PRAVEEN K. UPPAR, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6800 WP No. 102643 of 2023 THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Ms.Divya Achari., counsel on behalf of Sri.Venkatesh M.Kharvi., for the petitioner and Sri.Praveen K.Uppar., AGA for the respondents have appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel Ms.Divya Achari., submits that a conscious decision is taken by the counsel on record and the petitioner about infructuous of the petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file a review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP/RH LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 46