Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5019 (GAU)

Senpi Rakshap v. The State of AP and 2 Ors

WP(C)/560/2024 · 2025-04-23

Manish Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040016222024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/560/2024 Senpi Rakshap Age: 49 Occupation : Address:Son of Late Gosen Rakshap permanent resident of Itanagar Po and PS Itanagar District Capital Complex Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP and 2 Ors Age: 0 Occupation : Address:represented by the Secretary (Home) Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 2:The Officer in Charge Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Police Station Aalo cum Investigating Officer in Aalo PS Case No. 60/ 2024 Aalo West Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 3:The Branch Manager Age: 0 Occupation : Address:State Bank of India Aalo Branch Aalo PO and PS Aalo West Siang District Page No.# 2/2 Arunachal Pradesh. ------------ Advocate for : Nikita Danggen Advocate for : GA (AP) appearing for The State of AP and 2 Ors: Advocate , , appearing for 2, 3, respectively. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 24.04.2025 Heard Ms. N. Danggen, learned counsel for the petitioner; Ms. G. Ete, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Arunachal Pradesh for the respondent nos.1 and 2; as well as Ms. Y. Karga, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no.3 (SBI). Ms. Danggen, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted, on instructions, that the petitioner, at this stage, does not want to pursue the writ petition and wants to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to approach again and/or to avail other appropriate remedy as permissible under the law. In view of the above submission made by Ms. Danggen, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal with liberty, as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant