IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1290 CWP-13402-2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 23.05.2025 Mangat Ram ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and Others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : None for the petitioner Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, DAG Punjab ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Prayer made in the present petition for directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to retire on attaining the age of 60 years instead of 58 years, which he was to complete on 31.07.2010, might not due to efflux of time, even be surviving especially in wake of the fact that there being no interim order in his favour. 2. Learned State counsel on the other hand refers to para 2 of the preliminary submissions of the written statement dated 03.02.2010 filed on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 4, to which there was no counter filed, wherein it has been stated that the age of superannuation for employees of Class-III to Class-I employees was 58 years and it was only with regard to Class-IV that it was extended to 60 years. 3. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, by demonstrating that the lis still survives. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 23.05.2025 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No MOHIT 2025.05.23 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document