APHC010649902022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 38765/2022 Between: 1. ALLU RAMU NAIDU, S/O MAHALAKSHMI, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RIO SETTIPALEM VILLAGE, MAKAVARAPALEM MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 2. NALLURI ANIL KUMAR, S/O SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RIO KURMANNAPALEM VILLAGE, GAJUWAKA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING,VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE SUPERINTEDNENT OF POLICE, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAMBILI, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 4. VANAPALLI JAGANNADHA RAO, S/O LATE APPALA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, REP. BY ITS G.P.A. HOLDER VANAPALLI VENKATA ARUNA LATHA, W/O JAGGANADHA RAO, RIO KOTHAPETA VILLAGE, GOVINDAPALEM POST, RAMBILLI MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over the land in Sy.No.53-2 to an extent of Ac.1.00 cents and Ac.0.88 cents, respectively situated at Haripuram Village, Rambilli Mandal, Anakapalli District and sought to be dispossessed at the instance of the 4th respondent is highly illegally, arbitrary, colourable exercise of the power, apart from violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over the land in Sy.No.53-2 to an extent of Ac.1.00 cents and Ac.0.88 cents, respectively 2 situated at Haripuram Village, Rambilli Mandal, Anakapalli District at the instance of the 4th respondent and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V V N NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. T V SRI DEVI 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioners for the following relief: <.... to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over the land in Sy.No.53-2 to an extent of Ac.1.00 cents and Ac.0.88 cents, respectively situated at Haripuram Village, Rambilli Mandal, Anakapalli District and sought to be dispossessed at the instance of the 4th respondent is highly illegally, arbitrary, colourable exercise of the power, apart from violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over the land in Sy.No.53-2 to an extent of Ac.1.00 cents and Ac.0.88 cents, respectively situated at Haripuram Village, Rambilli Mandal, Anakapalli District at the instance of the 4th respondent and pass ...= At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that respondent Police are interfering in the possession and enjoyment of the subject property. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions would submit that there are civil disputes between the Petitioners and unofficial respondent and that civil suits are also pending before the concerned civil Court and that respondent Police never interfered in the civil disputes between the parties and would submit that this Writ Petition may be disposed of by passing appropriate orders. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except following due process of law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 38765 of 2022 19.11.2025 Mjl /*