1 2025:CGHC:10012 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 206 of 2025 Chandrashekhar S/o Shri Phattelal Aged About 38 Years R/o Village And Post Budbud, P.S. And Tahsil Pali Distt. Korba (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. South Eastern Coalfield Limited Through The Chairman Cum Managing Director Seepat Road District Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. The Chief General Manager, Secl, Korba Area, District Korba (C.G.) 3. The Sub Area Manager, Saraipali Open Cast Mining Project, Secl, Korba (C.G.) 4. The Collector, Distt. Korba (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Applicant : Mr. Vikas Ghritlahare, Advocate For Non-applicants No. 1 to 3 : Ms. Swati Agrawal, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment On Board 28/02/2025 1) Learned counsel for the applicant submits that name of father of applicant was wrongly mentioned as “Phattelal” instead on “Fattelal” in the order dated 15.01.2025 passed in WPC No. 6298 of 2024. He prays to modify the name of father of applicant from “Phattelal” to “Fattelal” in the cause-title of WPC No. 6298 of 2024. 2 2) On the other hand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents opposes. 3) Heard. 4) Persual of the writ petition filed by present applicant would show that name of applicant’s father was mentioned as “Phattelal” and same has been reflected in the order dated 15.01.2024 . 5) Taking into consideration the fact that there is no typographical mistake in the order impugned, I do not find any good ground to modify the name of applicant’s father in the cause-title of the original order. 6) Consequently, this application fails and is hereby dismissed. Sd/- Rakesh Mohan Pandey JUDGE Ajinkya