IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 130 Sneh Lata Parleen Kaur Brar (PCS), Secretary, Punjab School Education Board, Phase CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Kushkaran K. Goyal, raised by the Registry on Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, the petition, on which objections have been ra the counsel party, who filed it, to re However, the same was not taken back for refiling after removal of objections. On failure, the case is to be listed before the Court for orders. Following note was displayed/published by the Registry in the causelist and website of this Hon'ble Court on INCOMP No.1137-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH IN-COMP No. In CWP-27808 DIARY No.10456161 Date of decision : Sneh Lata Versus Parleen Kaur Brar (PCS), Secretary, Punjab School Education Board, Phase-VIII, Sector 62, Mohali CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) The aforesaid petition was filed on Kushkaran K. Goyal, Advocate. However, certain objections were raised by the Registry on 29.4.2025. As per Rule 9, Chapter I, Part Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, the petition, on which objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel party, who filed it, to re-file within a period of 40 days. However, the same was not taken back for refiling after removal of objections. On failure, the case is to be listed before the Court for ers. Following note was displayed/published by the Registry in the causelist and website of this Hon'ble Court on 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1137 of 2025 27808-2022 10456161 Date of decision :-24.09.2025 …..Petitioner Parleen Kaur Brar (PCS), Secretary, Punjab School Education …..Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA The aforesaid petition was filed on 24.4.2025 by Mr. Advocate. However, certain objections were As per Rule 9, Chapter I, Part-A, Volume V, Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, the petition, on which ised by the Registry is to be taken back by file within a period of 40 days. However, the same was not taken back for refiling after removal of objections. On failure, the case is to be listed before the Court for ers. Following note was displayed/published by the Registry in the causelist and website of this Hon'ble Court on 08.7.2025:- VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.26 09.14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Advocate to collect his case for re objections, the needful was not done. Consequently, the matter has been listed before this Court in urgent list today. further order is required to be passed. The file be consigned to the records. September 24, 2025 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No INCOMP No.1137-2025 "All the Advocates/Parties are requested to collect the cases as mentioned in the list attached below which are lying pending in t Counter of DRR Branch and not taken back till today, within one month of the date of publication of this notice, failing which all the cases (except the Caveat Applications) will be listed before Hon'ble Court on judicial side for appropriate orders." Even after the publication of the note requesting the Advocate to collect his case for re-filing after rectification of objections, the needful was not done. Consequently, the matter has been listed before this Court in urgent list today. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts of the matter, no further order is required to be passed. The file be consigned to the September 24, 2025 speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 "All the Advocates/Parties are requested to collect the cases as mentioned in the list attached below which are lying pending in the Objection Counter of DRR Branch and not taken back till today, within one month of the date of publication of this notice, failing which all the cases (except the Caveat Applications) will be listed before Hon'ble Court on judicial side for appropriate Even after the publication of the note requesting the filing after rectification of objections, the needful was not done. Consequently, the matter has been listed before this Court in urgent list today. is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts of the matter, no further order is required to be passed. The file be consigned to the ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.26 09.14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document