i APHC010555552014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 8034 OF 2014 Between: 1. Kanumuri Bharathi, Wife of Krishanm Raju, Aged about 61 years, Occ: House wife, 2. Kanumuri Nanda Kishore Varma, Son of Krishanm Raju, Aged about 40 years, 3. Kanumuri Suryanarayana Varma, Son of late Venkata Ram Raju, Aged about 61 years, 4. Kanumuri Kamalavathi, Wife of late Narasimha Raju, Aged about 70 years, 5. Kanumuri Satyavathi, W/o. Late K.V.S. Raju, Aged about 72 years, 6. Kanumuri Sitarama Raju, S/o. Satyabarayana Raju, Aged about 51 years, 7. Kanumuri Rama Varma, S/o Krishnam Raju Aged about 43 years. All are residents of Yendada Village, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ...Petitioners AND 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Joint Collector, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. r 4. The Tahsildar/ Mandal Revenue Officer, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2'^^ respondent in not passing orders in the interim application filed along with Revision Petition under Section 9 of A.P. Rights in Lands & Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 filed by the petitioners assailing the correctness of the orders of the Tahsildar in proceedings in Rc. No.643/2012/A dated 21.12.2013, as confirmed by the Revenue Divisional Officer vide proceedings bearing Rc. No. 78/2014/C dated 25.02.2014 in respect of the land in all admeasuring Ac. 32.00 cets covered by Sy. Nos. 15/1, 15/2, 15/3, 15/4, 15/5, 16/1, 16/6 & 13/5 of Yendada Village, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal, Visakhapatnam District as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India by setting the said inaction, and consequently, direct the 2'"'^ respondent to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer vide proceedings bearing Rc. No. 78/2014/C dated 25.02.2014 in respect of the land in all admeasuring Ac. 32.00 cets covered by Sy. Nos. 15/1, 15/2, 15/3, 15/4, 15/5, 16/1, 16/6 & 13/5 of Yendada Village, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, pending disposal of the revision petition dated 10.3.2014. lA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 10009 OF 20141 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to dispossess petitioners in respect of the and in all admeasuring Ac. 32.00 cents covered by Sy. Nos. 15/1, 15/2, 15/3, 15/4, 15/5, 16,11, 16/6 & 13/5 of Yendada Village, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, pending Revision Petition dated 10.3.2014 before the 2'^^ respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI S SYAMSUNDER RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following Order: i r APHC010555552014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 8034/2014 Between: 1.KANUMURI BHARATHI,, WIFE OF KRISHANM RAJU, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, 2.KANUMURI NANDA KISHORE VARMA,, SON OF KRISHANM RAJU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 3.KANUMURI SURYANARAYANA VARMA RAM RAJU, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, 4.KANUMURI KAMALAVATHI AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, 5.KANUMURI SATYAVATHI,, W/0. LATE K.V.S. RAJU, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS. SON OF LATE VENKATA j > WIFE OF LATE NARASIMHA RAJU, 1) 6.KANUMURI SITARAMA RAJU,, S/0. SATYABARAYANA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, 7.KANUMURI RAMA VARMA, S/0 KRISHNAM RAJU AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF YENDADA VILLAGE, VISAKHAPATNAM RURAL MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARY, REVENUE HYDERABAD. REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, 2.THE JOINT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. VISAKHAPATNAM 3.THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4.THE TAHSILDAR/ MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM RURAL MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not passing orders in the interim application filed along with Revision Petition under Section 9 of A.P. Rights in Lands & Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 filed by the petitioners assailing the correctness of the orders of the Tahsildar in proceedings in Rc. No.643/2012/A dated 21.12.2013, as confirmed by the Revenue Divisional Officer vide proceedings bearing Rc. No. 78/2014/C dated 25.02.2014 in respect of the land in all admeasuring Ac. 32.00 cets covered by Sy. Nos. 15/1, 15/2, 15/3, 15/4, 15/5, 16/1, 16/6 & 13/5 of Yendada Village, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal, Visakhapatnam District as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India by setting the said inaction, and consequently, direct the 2nd respondent to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer vide proceedings bearing Rc. No. 78/2014/C dated 25.02.2014 in respect of the land in all admeasuring Ac. 32.00 cets covered by Sy. Nos. 15/1, 15/2, 15/3, 15/4, 15/5, 16/1, 16/6 & 13/5 of Yendada Village, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal, 'Visakhapatnam District, pending disposal of the revision petition dated 10.3.2014 and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 10009 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to dispossess petitioners in respect of the and in all admeasuring Ac. 32.00 cents covered by Sy. Nos. 32.00 cents covered by Sy. Nos. 15/1, 15/2, 15/3, 15/4, 15/5, 16,11, 16/6 & 13/5 of Yendada Village, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandat, Visakhapatnam District, pending Revision Petition dated 10.3.2014 before the 2nd respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitloner(S): 1.S SYAMSUNDER RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order; Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissd as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATA RAO deputyj^egistrar SECTI //TRUE COPY// OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri. S SYAMSUNDER RAO, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for REVENUE, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies vna HIGH COURT DATED:12/09/2025 ORDER WP NO. 8034 OF 2014 ^ H OCT 2025 I •:c> OV ' 3:i •ay DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS