SMT KAMLESH VERMA AND ANR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS
CRLW/281/2015 · 2025-11-01
Anand Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50158 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50158 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:43890] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 281/2015
1. Smt Kamlesh Verma D/o Shri Hari Singh, W/o Shri Sultan Singh Mahawar, aged about 19 years, R/o Khudanpuri Marg, Alwar (Raj.) Present address Garh Himmat Singh, Dausa (Raj.). 2. Sultan Singh Mahawar S/o Shri Ghasi Ram Mahawar, aged about 21 years, R/o Khudanpuri Marg, Alwar (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through its Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Station House Officer, Police Station N.E.B., District Alwar (Raj.). 3. The Station House Officer, Police Station Mandawar, District Dausa (Raj.). 4. Hari Singh S/o Shri Dhandhari Lal, R/o Khudanpuri Marg, Alwar (Raj.). 5. Har Chand S/o Shri Dhandhari Lal, R/o Khudanpuri Marg, Alwar (Raj.). 6. Tinku S/o Shri Harchand, R/o Khudanpuri Marg, Alwar (Raj.). 7. Kishore Lal S/o Shri Dhandari Lal, R/o Khudanpuri Marg, Alwar (Raj.). 8. Immrat S/o Shri Dhandhari Lal, R/o Khudanpuri Marg, Alwar (Raj.). 9. Om Prakas S/o Shri Kishore Lal, R/o Khudanpuri Marg, Alwar (Raj.). 10. Rinku S/o Shri Premi, R/o Khudanpuri, Alwar (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 01/11/2025
1. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners. [2025:RJ-JP:43890] (2 of 2) [CRLW-281/2015]
2. This joint petition was filed by the petitioners No. 1 & 2 stating therein that both of them are major and have performed marriage in Arya Samaj Mandir, Dadri Gautam Budh Nagar, U.P. On the basis of which, one marriage certificate has also been issued by the competent authority, however, their relatives were giving them life threat. Therefore, while exercising their right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, petitioners prayed for granting them protection. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has placed one factual report dated 01.08.2017 before this Court, which is taken on record, revealing therein that on 12.07.2017, petitioner No.1-Kamlesh Verma came to the Police Station, where her statements were recorded and in her statements although it was stated that she went with petitioner No.2 voluntarily and also performed Court marriage yet, thereafter, on account of difference of opinion and marital discord, she has separated herself with the petitioner No.2 and has been residing with her parents. Under these circumstances, she has also stated that she does not want to pursue the petition before this Court. 4.
There is no one to controvert the facts stated in the factual report dated 01.08.2017. 5. In the light of above, no case for interference is made out. Hence, the instant Criminal Writ Petition, is hereby, dismissed. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH-GARIMA/70