SHIVDAYAL GUPTA S/O LATE SHRI RAMBHAROSI GUPTA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/12182/2025 · 2025-08-14
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50156 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50156 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:31881] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12182/2025 Shivdayal Gupta S/o Late Shri Rambharosi Gupta, Aged About 55 Years, R/o- Gram Panchayat Mahukhas, Tehsil Hindaun, District Karauli (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary And Food Commissioner, Food Civil Supplies And Consumer Affairs Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur
2. District Collector (Supply), Karauli (Raj.)
3. District Supply Officer, Karauli (Raj.) ----Respondents With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12194/2025 Tejram Meena S/o Shri Maddulal Meena, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Gram Panchayat Mui, Tehsil And District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary And Food Commissioner, Food Civil Supply And Consumer Affairs Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. District Collector (Supply), Sawai Madhopur (Raj.)
3. District Supply Officer, Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12196/2025 Satendra Pal Prajapat Son Of Sh. Shri Harilal Prajapat, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Gram Panchayat Jahadoo, Tehsil Kathumar, District Alwar (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary And Food Commissioner, Food And Civil Supply And Consumer Affairs Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur. [2025:RJ-JP:31881] (2 of 4) [CW-12182/2025]
2. District Collector (Supply), Alwar (Raj). 3. District Supply Officer, Alwar (Raj). ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12197/2025
1. Brijkishore Sharma Son Of Shri Ramswaroop Sharma, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Gram Panchayat Sengarpura, Tehsil Karauli, District Karauli (Rajasthan). 2. Ramesh Chand Gurjar Son Of Shri Ramprasad Gurjar, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Gram Panchayat Sengarpura, Tehsil Karauli, District Karauli (Rajasthan). ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary And Food Commissioner, Food And Civil Supplies, And Consumer Affairs Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. District Collector (Supply), Karauli (Raj). 3. District Supply Officer, Karauli (Raj). ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12224/2025 Sardar Singh Gurjar S/o Shri Kishan Lal Gurjar, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Gram Panchayat Kolana, Tehsil Baswa, District Dausa (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary And Food Commissioner, Food Civil Supply And Consumer Affairs Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. District Collector (Supply), Dausa (Raj.)
3. District Supply Officer, Dausa (Raj.) ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12249/2025
1. Anil Kumar Sharma S/o Nauranglal Sharma, Aged About 29
[2025:RJ-JP:31881] (3 of 4) [CW-12182/2025] Years, R/o Ward 3, Bhatiwar, Jhunjhunun, Raj.- 333026. 2. Rajesh Kumar Saini S/o Phula Ram Saini, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Rajeevpura, Manaksas, Tehsil Udaipurwati, Manaksas, Jhunjhunun, Raj.- 333801. 3.
Sunil Kumar Saini S/o Lunaram Saini, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Ward No.-17, Dhani-Kuntakala (Gura Dhahar) Guda, Gura, Jhunjhunun, Raj.- 333053. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Food And Civil Supply And Consumer Matter Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. The Food Commissioner, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. The District Collector (Logistics), Government Of Rajasthan, Jhunjhunun, Rajasthan. 4. District Logistics Officer, Government Of Rajasthan, Jhunjhunun. 5. The District Supply Officer (Rasad), District Jhunjhunu, (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shashi Bhushan Gupta with Ms. Sudha Gupta Ms. Nidhi Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Abhilasha Vaishnav for Mr. Lokendra Singh Rao, Dy.GC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 14/08/2025
1. The present bunch of petitions pertain to various districts for allotment and other issues pertaining to fair price shops. The competent authority is stated to be concerned District Collector or any officer authorised by him.
[2025:RJ-JP:31881] (4 of 4) [CW-12182/2025]
2.
Learned counsel Ms. Abhilasha Vaishnav on behalf of Mr. Lokendra Singh Rao, Dy.GC has taken a preliminary objection that the matters primarily pertain to policy and there are different factual disputes which can be addressed before the competent authority. However, learned counsel is agreeable to the fact that the contentions or grievances of the petitioners herein can be heard within a period of 15 days by the competent authority i.e. District Collector. It is submitted that after giving due audience and considering the representation of the petitioners, appropriate speaking order will be passed by the competent authority.
3. In light of the submissions made by learned counsel, this Court deems it proper to dispose of these petitions with a direction that the petitioners or aggrieved parties mark their appearance before the concerned District Collector in-between 26.08.2025 and 27.08.2025 at and around 11:00 am and after giving due audience, speaking order will be passed by the competent authority.
4. This Court makes it clear that till passing of orders, the allotment of the shops qua the disputed sites will be kept in abeyance; passing of this order will not cause any prejudice to either of the sides.
5. These petitions are accordingly, disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed.
6. Appropriate remedy will be available to the petitioners, if they are aggrieved by the order passed by the District Collector.
(SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/13-16, 20, 25