Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50153 (AP)

Vinayagamoorthy Veluchamy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/10828/2025 · 2025-10-16

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010543262025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10828/2025 Between: 1. VINAYAGAMOORTHY VELUCHAMY, S/O VELUCHAMY, AGED 37 YEARS, OCC FORMER HEAD OF SECTION, KIA INDIA PVT. LTD. R/O D.NO. 2-20/43, THOOPUR STREET, SAKKAMPATTI VILLAGE, ANDIPATTI TALUK, THENI DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU - 625512. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P. AMARAVATI. KIA INDUSTRIAL AREA PS, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT 2. K SAI NANDAN, S/O BABU RAO KARUMANCHI, AGED 35 YEARS, OCC HEAD OF PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, KIA INDIA PVT. LTD., R/O ERRAMANCHI VILLAGE, PENUKONDA MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. BASIREDDY GARI SOMANATHESWARA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10828/2025 ORDER: The instant criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 8Cr.P.C)/under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 8BNSS9) has been filed by the petitioner/accused No.2, seeking quashment of the proceedings pending against him in FIR No.24 of 2025, of Kia Industrial Area Police Station, Sri Sathya Sai District registered for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 316(5), 338, 238(a) and 61(1) of BNS. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Basireddy Gari Somanatheswara Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with a liberty to file a fresh petition. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State is in attendance. 5. In that view of the matter, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh petition. 3 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 17.10.2025. UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10828/2025 Dated.17.10.2025 UPS 66