Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:131400 Court No. - 71 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 582 of 2025 Applicant :- Ranjeet @ Ranjeet Gautam And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anjani Kumar Mishra,Rajesh Kumar Yadav,Umesh Kumar Prasad Counsel for Opposite Party :- Abhimanu Kumar,G.A.,Yadav Rahul Ramkrishnan Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J. 1. Certified copy of compromise verification report filed on behalf of the applicants today in Court is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and learned AGA for the State. 3. This application u/s 482 CrPC has been filed with the prayer to quash the entire proceedings of Session Trial No. 15 of 2024 (State v. Mahipal and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 201 of 2022, under Sections 308, 452, 323, 504, 506 of I.P.C., P.S.- Kotwali Jalaun, District- Jalaun, pending in the court of Session Judge, Jalaun at Orai, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 4. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicants that the alleged dispute between the parties has taken place due to misconception and that now both the parties have amicably settled the dispute and the informant of the case and the victim do not want to pursue the impugned proceedings. In the alleged incident, the injured has not sustained any serious injury. In pursuance to order dated 12.06.2025, passed by this Court, both the parties have filed compromise before the trial court, which has duly been verified vide order dated 04.07.2025, the certified copy of the same is available on record. It was submitted that in view of aforesaid facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 has concurred with the arguments of learned counsel for the applicants and submitted that both the parties have amicably settled the dispute and compromised the matter and the informant and the injured do not want to proceed with the case pending before the trial court and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed. 6. Learned A.G.A. has no objection if parties compromise the matter. 7. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 8. It is well settled that in appropriate cases criminal proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise by invoking inherent powers enshrined under Section 482 CrPC. In the instant case, the injured has not sustained any serious injury. If parties compromise the matter, it would not have adverse impact on society. The informant of the case and the injured do not want to pursue the impugned proceedings. There is nothing to indicate that applicants have any criminal antecedents. The compromise filed by the parties before the trial court, has already been verified by the court concerned. In view of these facts and circumstances, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed. 9. In view of the aforesaid, the entire impugned proceedings, including charge-sheet & cognizance / summoning order, of the aforesaid case, against applicants, namely, Ranjeet @ Ranjeet Gautam, Mahipal, Sunil are hereby quashed. 10. The application u/s 482 CrPC is allowed. Order Date :- 4.8.2025 Rama Kant Digitally signed by :- RAMA KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad