IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI^^^ TUESDAY THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY ™0 THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SREENIVASA REDDY npiMiMAl PFTITION NO: 3721 OF 2025 \ dr T.\' om O. THE HON Dptw6@n” residing at Hyderabad. ...PETITIONERS AND ...RESPONDENT 438 of Cr.P.C u/s 482 BNSS praying that in Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pieased to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners/Accused Nos.2 & 3 herein in the event of their arrest in with Un-Registered Crime No. 12025 of Kaikaluru Police Kalkaluru to enlarge them on bail in the event of their surrender. Petition under Section the circumstances stated in the connection Station, for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum hearing the arguments of Sri Petitioner and the Public This Petition coming on of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon Manchanapalli, Advocate for the Srinivas Prosecutor on behalf of the sole Respondent. The Court made the following ORDER: APHC010160712025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] TUESDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3721 OF 2025 Between: ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) Addagarla Satya Kumari and Others AND ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT The State Of Andhra Pradesh Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1.SRINIVAS MANCHANAPALLI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER:- The Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, is filed on behalf of the petitioners to grant anticipatory bail in connection with un-registered Crime of Kaikaluru Police Station, Kaikaluru. The brief facts of the case are that the de-facto complainant by name 2) Alla Naga Divya @ Addagarla Naga Divya, W/o Addagarla Suresh, who is brother of 2"^^ petitioner and son of 1®* petitioner, lodged a false complaint i against the petitioners and others and they were summoned by the respondent/ police. The respondent/ police also are attempting to register a crime against the petitioners and others and hence, the present Criminal Petition came to be filed. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are arrayed as Accused 2 and 3 in the report lodged by one Addagarla Naga Divya and they were summoned by the respondent/ police with regard to the said report lodged by her and as there is threat of apprehension in the hands of respondent/ police, this Criminal Petition came 3) to be filed. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the Respondent/ State submits that no crime is registered against the petitioners herein as on date. Pursuant to the above report and if any crime is going to be registered against the petitioners herein, the Respondent/ Police will follow due procedure contemplated under the law. 4) as 5) Heard. Perused the record. 6) As no Criminal Case has been registered against the petitioners as on date, as stated by the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, question of granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners would not arise. 7) Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. Sd/- SHAIK MOHAMMED RAFI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER Station, Kaiakaluru. 2. One CC to Sri Srinivas Manchanapalli, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CC to Public Prosecutor, High Court 4. Two CD Copies //TRUE COPY// To, 1. The Station House Officer Kaikaluru Police of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] Chp RAM HIGH COURT DATED:06/05/2025 ORDER CRLP.No.3721 of 2025 1S SFP 2025 % II Current seeiion DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION