KOTTU NAGA SRINIVASA RAO v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/27005/2021 · 2025-09-21
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50148 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50148 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010446392021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27005/2021 Between:
1. KOTTU NAGA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. KOTTU VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED. 43 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O T.
NARSAPURAM VILLAGE, PEDAVEGI MANDAL, CHAKRAYAGUDEM VILLAGE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ELURU.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ELURU.
4. THE TAHSILDAR PEDAVEGI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PEDAVEGI POLICE STATION, PEDAVEGI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. C.T IS AMENDED AS PER THE COURT ORDER DT 20.02.2024 VIDE
ORDER PASSED IN I.A.NO 1 OF 2024.
7. SMT GORRELA SIMHACHALAM, S/O. LATE KRISHNA RAO, AGED.
61 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. CHAKRAYAPALEM VILLAGE, PEDAVEGI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
8. SRI GORRELA PRASAD, S/O. G. CHINPALDI NAIDU AGED. 44 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. CHAKRAYAPALEM VILLAGE, PEDAVEGI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
9. SMT GORRELA NAGASRIVANI, W/O. GORRELA PRASAD AGED. 40 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. CHAKRAYAPALEM VILLAGE, PEDAVEGI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KALLA TULASI DURGAMBA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. GP FOR REVENUE
3. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY
2
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“.... to issue writ or direction preferably Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the official respondents in not considering the representation dt.05.11.2021 made by the petitioner and not providing the police protection to the petitioner's property and life of the petitioner in respect of the property admeasuring Ac.1-00 cents in RS.No.322/1, Ac.1-00 cents out of Ac.6-30 cents in RS.No.322/3, Ac.1-10 cents in R.S.No.322/3 and Ac.2- 00 cents in RS No.374/2 totally admeasuring Ac.5-10 cents, situated at Chakrayagudem Village, Pedavegi Mandal, West Godavari District as illegal, arbitrary and against all settled principles of law and consequently direct the police to provide police protection and life protection to the petitioner to enter into the land and to cultivate his agricultural by providing police aid and take action against in accordance with law”
2. Heard Ms.K.Tulasidurgamba, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that in the light of the interim orders passed by this Court, they attended the cause of the petitioner.
4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to make a representation as and when necessary. Upon receiving such representation, the police are directed to look into the matter and take appropriate action according to governing Rules and Law. There shall be no
order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:22.09.2025 Asr
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.27005 of 2021
Dt.22.09.2025
Asr