Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50146 (AP)

KOTHAMASU SATYANARAYANA, v. M/S. DEEPAK AGENCIES, CHENNAI AND ANOTHER,

CMA/4820/2004 · 2025-10-15

B S Bhanumathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010497242004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) Thursday, the Sixteenth day of October, Two Thousand and Twenty Five The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Civil Miscellaneous Appeal Between: Kothamasu Satyanarayana and M/s.Deepak Agencies, Chennai Counsel for the appellant: 1. B.Parameswara Rao Counsel for the respondent Nil The Court made the following This appeal is filed under section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act,1988 against the award and the 2003 on the file of the Court of the Motor cum-X-Additional District Judge, Guntur. 2. No representation for the the caption ‘for dismissal’ a 09.10.2025, the appeal shall be 3. Hence, the appeal is costs. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Thursday, the Sixteenth day of October, Two Thousand and Twenty Five Present The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 4820 of 2004 Kothamasu Satyanarayana ...A Chennai and another ...Respondent ppellant: espondents: The Court made the following Judgment: This appeal is filed under section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act,1988 the decree dated 25.08.2004 in M.V.O.P.No.172 of 2003 on the file of the Court of the Motor Vehicles Accidents Claims Tribunal Additional District Judge, Guntur. No representation for the appellant inspite of posting the matter under as there was no representation for the appellant on shall be dismissed. is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3311] Thursday, the Sixteenth day of October, Two Thousand and Twenty Five ...Appellant ...Respondents This appeal is filed under section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act,1988 decree dated 25.08.2004 in M.V.O.P.No.172 of Accidents Claims Tribunal- inspite of posting the matter under s no representation for the appellant on shall be no order as to 2 BSB,J C.M.A.No.4820 of 2004 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this appeal shall stand closed. ___________________ ___ JUSTICE B.S. BHANUMATHI Dated 16.10.2025 GRL 3 BSB,J C.M.A.No.4820 of 2004 202 The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi C.M.A No.4820 of 2004 Date: 16.10.2025 GRL