Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50145 (PNJ)

SATNAM KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/11699/2025 · 2025-04-29

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 124 CWP-11699-2025 Date of decision: 29.04.2025 Satnam Kaur ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : Mr. N.K. Banka, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, DAG, Punjab. ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer made in the present petition is for directing the respondents to refix the pay/salary, pay-scale as per seniority and pay the arrears w.e.f. 01.08.2019. 2. Learned counsel would contend that regarding the claim raised in the present petition, a legal notice dated 06.02.2025, Annexure P-7, has been served upon the respondents, which has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. 3. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the legal notice dated 06.02.2025, Annexure P-7, within a period of 6 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to her and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to her interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 29.04.2025 Hemant Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No HAMANT 2025.04.30 09:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document