Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50144 (PNJ)

RAM PHAL v. SATBIR SINGH KADIAN

COCP/2022/2025 · 2025-09-16

Nidhi Gupta

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 105 Ram Phal Satbir Singh Kadian, Resources Department, Sinchai Bhawan, Sec. Haryana CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. proceedings against the respondent for not complying the order dated 29.4.2024 Court in CWP and others” vide which the petition was disposed of in terms of the statement made by learned counsel for the State to the effect that “…the pending legal notice, dated 06.2.2023, will be decided by respondent No.2, by passing a speaking order, in the judgments mentioned hereinabove, within three months…..”. instructions, informs that the present contempt petition has been rendered infructuous as a Speaking Order dated 24.6.2025 has been COCP-2022-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2022 of 2025 Date of decision : Ram Phal Versus Satbir Singh Kadian, Engineer-in-Chief, Irrigation and Water Resources Department, Sinchai Bhawan, Sec. CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent for not complying the order dated 29.4.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by a co Court in CWP-9473-2023 titled as “Ram Phal vs. State of Har and others” vide which the petition was disposed of in terms of the statement made by learned counsel for the State to the effect that “…the pending legal notice, dated 06.2.2023, will be decided by respondent No.2, by passing a speaking order, in the judgments mentioned hereinabove, within three months…..”. Learned counsel for the respondent instructions, informs that the present contempt petition has been rendered infructuous as a Speaking Order dated 24.6.2025 has been 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2022 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-16.09.2025 …..Petitioner Chief, Irrigation and Water Resources Department, Sinchai Bhawan, Sec.-5, Panchkula, …..Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent for not complying the order dated 1) passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Ram Phal vs. State of Haryana and others” vide which the petition was disposed of in terms of the statement made by learned counsel for the State to the effect that “…the pending legal notice, dated 06.2.2023, will be decided by respondent No.2, by passing a speaking order, in the light of the judgments mentioned hereinabove, within three months…..”. Learned counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions, informs that the present contempt petition has been rendered infructuous as a Speaking Order dated 24.6.2025 has been VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.18 10.27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document passed, which has further been challenged by the petitioner by way of CWP-22204 others”. on behalf of petitioner on the last date of hearing i.e.09.7.20 today none appears on behalf of petitioner. for the respondent been rendered infructuous. September Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-2022-2025 (O & M) d, which has further been challenged by the petitioner by way of 22204-2025 titled as “Ramphal vs. State of Haryana and The order sheets shows that there was no representation on behalf of petitioner on the last date of hearing i.e.09.7.20 today none appears on behalf of petitioner. Keeping in view the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent-State the present petition been rendered infructuous. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. September 16, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 d, which has further been challenged by the petitioner by way of 2025 titled as “Ramphal vs. State of Haryana and The order sheets shows that there was no representation on behalf of petitioner on the last date of hearing i.e.09.7.2025. Even today none appears on behalf of petitioner. Keeping in view the statement made by learned counsel State the present petition is disposed of has having application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.18 10.27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document