Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50139 (AP)

Ponnada Narasimhamurthy, v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/33428/2025 · 2025-12-01

D Ramesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

DR,J W.P.NO.33428 of 2025 APHC010645122025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] TUESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 33428/2025 Between: 1. PONNADA NARASIMHAMURTHY,, S/O LATE SURAYYA, AGED 59 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. SANIVADA VILLAGE, SRIKAKULAM RURAL MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. TAHSILDAR, SRIKAKULAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, SANIVADA VILLAGE, VILLAGE SECRETARIAT, SRIKAKULAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction on the part of respondents on petitioner's Representation dt. 17-09-2025 and 10.10.2025 submitted for deleting of his land of Ac.0.84 cents in Old Survey No.389 (New Survey No.80-5P) situated in Sanivada Village, Srikakulam Mandal, Srikakulam District, from the list of Prohibited Properties under Section 22-A (1) (d) of The Registration Act, 1908 and all records including online records DR,J W.P.NO.33428 of 2025 connected thereto, as illegal, irregular, irrational and amounts to non discharge of legal obligation conferred on them under the provisions of The Registration Act and offends articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representations and take steps for deletion of his said land from the list of prohibited properties IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 to consider and decide- petitioner’s Representation dt. 17.09.2025 and 10.10.2025 submitted for deleting of his land of Ac.0.84 cents in Old Survey No.389 (New Survey No.80-5P) situated in Sanivada Village, Srikakulam Mandal, Srikakulam District, from the list of Prohibited Properties under Section 22-A (1) (d) of The Registration Act, 1908 and all records including online records connected thereto, pending disposal of the main writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVAS AMBATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE DR,J W.P.NO.33428 of 2025 The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following relief: <…..Pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction on the part of respondents on petitioner's Representation dt. 17-09-2025 and 10.10.2025 submitted for deleting of his land of Ac.0.84 cents in Old Survey No.389 (New Survey No.80-5P) situated in Sanivada Village, Srikakulam Mandal, Srikakulam District, from the list of Prohibited Properties under Section 22-A (1) (d) of The Registration Act, 1908 and all records including online records connected thereto, as illegal, irregular, irrational and amounts to non discharge of legal obligation conferred on them under the provisions of The Registration Act and offends articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representations and take steps for deletion of his said land from the list of prohibited properties….= 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondents. 3. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the petitioners made representations for deletion of the subject property from the prohibitory list furnished under Section 22-A(1) of the Registration Act, 1908, no action has been taken so far. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader has submitted that the application for deletion of the subject property from the prohibitory list has to be made through online. 5. Considering the submissions made by both the learned counsel, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage, by granting liberty to the DR,J W.P.NO.33428 of 2025 petitioner to submit an online application seeking for deletion of the subject property from the prohibitory list within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Upon receipt of such application, the 2nd respondent – District Collector shall consider the same after getting report from the concerned authority and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of three (3) months thereafter. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date: 02.12.2025 Dvs DR,J W.P.NO.33428 of 2025 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH 289 WRIT PETITION No.33428 of 2025 Dated: 02.12.2025 Dvs