CHANDRA SHAKHER LALWANIA S/O SHRI RAMESH CHANDRA LAWANIA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/16652/2025 · 2025-10-31
Ashok Kumar Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50135 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50135 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:43734] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16652/2025 Chandra Shakher Lalwania S/o Shri Ramesh Chandra Lawania, Aged About 48 Years, R/o 144, Behind New Sabji Mandi, Near Raja Mandi, Nagar Palika Bhusawar, Bharatpur, Distt. Bharatpur- 321406 (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary To The Government, Medical And Health Department, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
2. The Director, Medical And Health Services, Directorate, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
3. The Additional Director (Admn.), Medical And Health Services Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.)
4. The Mission Director (Nhm), Directorate Of Medical, Health And Family Welfare Services, Swasthya Bhawan, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
5. The Additional Mission Director (Nhm), Directorate Of Medical, Health And Family Welfare Services, Swasthya Bhawan, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
6. The Project Director (Nhm), Directorate Of Medical, Health And Family Welfare Services, Swasthya Bhawan, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
7. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Bharatpur, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 31/10/2025
1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer:
[2025:RJ-JP:43734] (2 of 3) [CW-16652/2025]
“sThe impugned order dated 08.10.2025 & 09.10.2025 so far as relates to not allowing the Petitioner to participate in the selection process including document verification may kindly be quashed & set-aside and inaction of the respondents whereby the candidature of the Petitioner have not been considered against the posts lying vacant as determined by the respondents may kindly be held as illegal and arbitrary and further the respondents be
directed to allow the Petitioner the participate in the selection process including document verification and give appointment to the Petitioner on the post of GNM in NRHM scheme in accordance with the directions issued by the Hon'ble Court.”
2.
Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 19.12.2018 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14497/2017 Suresh Kumar and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur and judgment is approved by Hon’ble Division Bench in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.414/2019 State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs. Suresh Kumar and Ors. on 15.09.2025. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with
judgment dated 19.12.2018 and affirmed on 15.09.2025.
3. Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC accepts notice.
4. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed of in light of judgment dated 19.12.2018 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14497/2017 and partly modified on dated 15.09.2025 in D.B. Special Appeal
[2025:RJ-JP:43734] (3 of 3) [CW-16652/2025] Writ No.414/2019 by Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur.
5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 15 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of judgment referred hereinabove with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/490