Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50133 (RAJ)

REKHARAM, SON OF SHRI DUNGARAM v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/8176/2025 · 2025-12-18

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:51313] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8176/2025 Rekharam, Son of Shri Dungaram, Aged about 73 Years, Resi- dent of Plot No. 50, Flat No.G-1,Radhe Krishna Apartment, Moti Nagar, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor. 2. Mohan Choudhary, Son of Shri Dhannalal, Aged About 61 Years, Resident Of B-2, Gautam Path, Ramnagar, Sodala, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Giriraj P. Sharma For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP Mr. Rohan Kudi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 18/12/2025 1. By way of this Criminal Misc. Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.329/2023 registered at Police Station Bhankrota, District Jaipur (West) (Rajasthan), for offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468 & 471 of IPC on the basis of compromise. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that parties have settled their dispute amicably. It is further submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR are fruitless. The copy of compromise deed is annexed with this petition. [2025:RJ-JP:51313] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-8176/2025] 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise. It is also noteworthy here that complainant is father of the learned counsel for the complainant. 4. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604] and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 5. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.329/2023 registered at Police Station Bhankrota, District Jaipur (West) (Rajasthan), is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 6. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /285