Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50131 (ALL)

NAVED ALI AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A482/36215/2022 · 2025-08-21

Raj Beer Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:145434 Court No. - 71 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 36215 of 2022 Applicant :- Naved Ali And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Amar Jeet Singh,Bhuvnesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicants, in Court today, is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. This application u/s - 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing of the entire proceedings, including charge-sheet dated 07.12.2019 as well as cognizance order dated 16.01.2020, of Criminal Case No. 455 of 2020 (State Vs. Naved Ali and Others), arising out of Case Crime No. 558 of 2019, under Sections - 498-A, 323 I.P.C. and Section - 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station - Dhampur, District - Bijnor, pending in the court of C.J.M., Bijnor, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicants that applicant no. 1 is husband of daughter of the opposite party no. 2 / informant and remaining applicants are family members of applicant no. 1 and the matter relates to matrimonial dispute. Now both the parties have amicably settled the dispute and compromised the matter and the informant of the case and his daughter do not want to pursue the impugned proceedings. In the alleged incident, the daughter of informant / injured has not sustained any serious injury. It was submitted that the compromise filed by the parties before the trial court concerned, has already been verified by the court, copy of which is on record. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection if parties compromise the matter. 6. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 7. It is well settled that in appropriate cases criminal proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise by invoking inherent powers enshrined under Section - 482 Cr.P.C.. In the instant case, matter relates to matrimonial dispute, which is private in nature. If parties compromise the matter, it would not have adverse impact on society. There is nothing to indicate that applicants have any criminal antecedents. The compromise filed by the parties before the trial court, has already been verified by the court concerned. Considering aforesaid facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed. 8. In view of the aforesaid, entire impugned proceedings, including charge-sheet and cognizanc order, of the aforesaid case against applicants, namely, Naved Ali, Akhtar Ali and Smt. Nadima Khatoon, are hereby quashed. 9. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is allowed. Order Date :- 22.8.2025 S Rawat Digitally signed by :- SHOBHIT RAWAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad