[2025:RJ-JP:21958] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1295/2025 Hemant Kumar Meena S/o Shri Mahesh Meena, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Khohra Makroda, Police Station Reni, Distt. Alwar. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1365/2025 Saurabh Meena Son Of Shri Mukesh Kumar Meena, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Village Higota, Police Station Bejupada, District Dausa (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Singh Mr. Karanpal Singh For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP Mr. Ram Mohan Sharma with Mr. Hemraj Rodiya for Mr. Ankit Agrawal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 26/05/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0662/2024 registered at Police Station-Ramnagariya, District-Jaipur City (East) for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 140(3), 3(5), 308(2), 127(2), 61(2)(a) of BNS. [2025:RJ-JP:21958] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1295/2025] 2. Since both the bail applications arise out of common FIR, therefore these cases are being decided by a single order. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. He further submits that the petitioners are not named in the FIR and apart from that, there is no recovery from the present petitioners. There are no criminal antecedents against the present petitioners. He again submits that the petitioners are behind the Bar since 28.12.2024. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail applications and have submitted that in the identification parade, the petitioners have been identified by the witnesses. 6. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, looking to the arguments advanced by counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners- (1) Hemant [2025:RJ-JP:21958] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1295/2025] Kumar Meena S/o Shri Mahesh Meena (2) Saurabh Meena Son Of Shri Mukesh Kumar Meena shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/25-26