[2025:RJ-JP:49028] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18651/2025 Harish Kumar Sharma S/o Ratan Lal Sharma, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village Parliya, Post Laiswa, Via Bhadsouda, Tehsil Bhadesar, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Additional Director (Administration), Medical And Family Welfare Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur-302018, Rajasthan, India. 4. Rajasthan Paramedical Council, Through Its Registrar, G- 1, Kisan Bhawan, Lal Kothi, Jaipur-302016. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 02/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “(i) by issuing an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondent may be directed to give appointment to the Petitioner on the post of Lab Technician as the Petitioner secured more marks than the last cut off in his category on the vacant posts. (ii) by issuing an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents be directed to fill up [2025:RJ-JP:49028] (2 of 3) [CW-18651/2025] all advertised posts of Lab Technician pursuant to the advertisement dated 12.06.2020. (iii) By an appropriate writ, order and direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondent may kindly be directed to consider the case of petitioner as law laid down by this Hon'ble High Court in the case of Pawan Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP NO. 1665/2024) decided on 02.02.2024. iv) Any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case may kindly also be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC accepts notice. Office is directed to reflect his name as counsel for the respondents. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the [2025:RJ-JP:49028] (3 of 3) [CW-18651/2025] petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/53