1 30.ao.31.23.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR APPEAL AGAINST ORDER NO.31/2023 Mohanlal Kanaiyalal Gaud Vs. Maharashtra Oil Seeds Commercial & Industrial Corporation Ltd. by Special Executive Officer and Anr. ….…............................................................................................................................ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order or directions and Registrar's orders ........................................................................................................................................……….. Ms Gauri Venkatraman, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. M.V. Samarth, Sr. Advocate with Mr. a. S. Ponkshe, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. A. R. Chutke, A.G.P. for Respondent No.2/State. CORAM : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J. DATED : 11.07.2025 1. The appellant has filed the appeal against order. Earlier the status quo was granted in favour of the appellant. Thereafter, temporary injunction application was rejected, which is challenged before this Court. Though the interim temporary injunction was rejected, on 11.08.2022, the status quo was granted time to time. Thereafter, the present appeal is filed and on 26.05.2023, this Court has continued the status quo. Now the trial Court has proceeded the matter and the matter is listed for recording of evidence. 2. As the matter is listed for evidence, the present appeal is disposed of with direction to the trial Court to decide the matter within a period of six months from today. 3. The status quo as of today to continue during the pendency of the Suit. (MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) RGurnule 2025:BHC-NAG:6686