1 HN, J W.P.No.22707_2025 APHC010436152025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 22707/2025 Between: 1. V SARASWATHI, D/O LATE V. VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, RESIDING AT D.NO. 19-12-78, BAIRAGIPATTEDA, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, , PRIME HILL CREST, 4TH FLOOR, NEAR DGP OFFICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE TIRUPATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order, writ or direction. more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No. 3 in not initiating appropriate action the Petitioners Representations dt. 11.08.2025, 07.07.2025, 23.03.2025, and 02.09.2024 is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, and violation of Article 350 of the Constitution of India and in violation 2 HN, J W.P.No.22707_2025 of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondent No. 3 to initiate appropriate action in accordance with law basing on the Petitioners Representations dt. 11.08.2025, 07.07.2025, 23.03.2025, 02.09.2024 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased please to direct the Respondents to consider the petitioner’s Representations dt. 11.08.2025, 07.07.2025, 23.03.2025, and 02.09.2024 in accordance with law duly permitting the personal hearing of the petitioner pass appropriate orders for the issuance of TDR bonds in favour of Petitioner for her property acquired in the formation or widening of the Chinthalachenu Road and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. O UDAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC For M.Corporation in Rayalaseema region In 2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV 3 HN, J W.P.No.22707_2025 The Court made the following Order: 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of respondent authorities in issuing TDR bonds for the land acquired. In that regard, the petitioner submitted representations dated 11.08.2025, 07.07.2025 and 23.03.2025 and 02.09.2024. 2. It is submitted that the land admeasuring 25 ankanams belonging to the petitioner was acquired by the respondent authorities. It is further submitted that the property stands in the name of the petitioner’s mother, Narayanamma, who purchased the same vide registered sale deed bearing No.3359/1982. 3. It is submitted that the said property, along with other properties, was acquired by the 2nd respondent through respondent Nos.1 and 3 for better performance of public works. However, the petitioner was not issued TDR bonds, though several other affected landowners were issued TDR bonds. The petitioner was denied TDR bonds for the reasons best known to respondent No.3. 4. This Court requested the learned Standing counsel to ascertain the extent of land belonging to the petitioner that was acquired for public purposes. On written instructions, the learned Standing counsel submits that the respondent authorities are willing to issue TDR bonds, subject to the petitioner submitting the ownership document and a family member certificate. Having acquired the said property from her mother, the petitioner is called upon to submit a fresh family member certificate and a copy of the registered gift deed, registered will, or 4 HN, J W.P.No.22707_2025 unregistered will to the office of the 3rd respondent for taking necessary action for issuance of TDR bonds. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner succeeded to the property, and that the petitioner submitted a valid family member certificate. It is also submitted that the petitioner is in possession and enjoyment of the remaining extent of the property. 6. Considering the same, the endorsement dated 19.08.2025 shall be complied by the petitioner by submitting a family member certificate to the 3rd respondent, and the 3rd respondent shall issue TDR bonds after verification of the said documents within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of submission of such certificate. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:08.09.2025 NKA 5 HN, J W.P.No.22707_2025 219 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO:22707 of 2025 Date: 08.09.2025 NKA