APHC010280842021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16437/2021 Between: 1. KOTTE KOTESWARA RAO, S/O LATE CHENNAIAH, AGE. 72 YEARS, R/O. H.NO.13-10-2B, KOTRAVARI STREET, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, 0/O. SECRETARIATE, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUPERINDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, AT ONGOLE, 0/0. KURNOOL ROAD, SUJATHA NAGAR, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-523001. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINDENT OF POLICE, DARSI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, 0/O. DARSI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ADDANKI POLICE STATION, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, KORICHAPADU POLICE STATION, MEDARAMATLA MAIN RD, MEDARAMATLA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. YASAM VENKATA SUBBARAO, S/O. SESHAGIRI RAO, AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO,14-30/1, SARVODAYA COLONY,' VETAPALEM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Dr CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, by declaring the action of the 2 4th and 5th respondents in not to register the case by taking necessary action against the 6th respondent, basing on the report of the petitioner, dated 01-08-2021 as ill legal and arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14,19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondent. No. 2 to 5 to register the crime against the 6th Respondent, by taking necessary action as per law, basing on the report of the petitioner, dated 01-08- 2021.” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that the disputes between the parties are purely civil in nature. 3. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:23.09.2025 ASR 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.16437 of 2021 Dt.23.09.2025 Asr