Bejawada Kranthi Kumar @ Kranthi, v. The State of A P,
CRLP/995/2025 · 2025-02-19
K Sreenivasa Reddy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5012 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5012 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 APHC010040952025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 995/2025 Between: Bejawada Kranthi Kumar @ Kranthi, and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND The State Of A P ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1. KONDAPAVULURI JHANSI LAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following Order:
1. The Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, is filed on behalf of the petitioners/accused Nos.1, 2, 4, 5 & 6 to grant anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.248 of 2024 of Pedavegi Police Station, Eluru District.
2. A case has been registered against the petitioners/accused Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5 & 6 and another for the offences punishable under
2 Sections 341, 324, 506 read with 34 IPC and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of the SCs & STs (PoA) Act.
3. Case of the prosecution is that, on 20.06.2024, the de-facto complainant lodged a report stating that on 19.06.2024 at 11.30 p.m., he, along with his friends, was going to Vanguru Village on motor cycle. On reaching near Polavaram right canal, Lakshmipuram Village, in view of the previous disputes, the accused persons obstructed the de-facto complainant. They allegedly abused the de-facto complainant using filthy language referring his caste and further threatened to kill him
4. A perusal of the material available on record, it is apparent that the primary accusation against the accused is that the accused allegedly abused the defacto complainant in the name of his caste. In such circumstances, the question of maintainability of the Criminal Petition seeking anticipatory bail itself would not arise.
5. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shall stand closed.
_____________________________ JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY 19.02.2025 PKR
3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SREENIVASA REDDY
474
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 995/2025
19.02.2025 PKR