Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50119 (AP)

SEETHA MALLIKARJUNA v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/32209/2022 · 2025-11-18

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010527022022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 32209/2022 Between: SEETHA MALLIKARJUNA, S/O VENKATA SUBBULU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. PVT. EMPLOYEE, RIO BANGARUPET VILLAGE, VENKATAGIRI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, (PRESENTLY TIRUPATHI DISTRICT AT TIRUPATHI) NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, A.P.,. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VENKATAGIRI POLICE STATION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. AKHILA NAIDU PANCHADI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd and 3rd Respondents in not considering the representations dated 28-11- 2018 and 02-08-2022 for deleting/closing the suspect sheet No. 611 against the petitioner, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the Respondents 2 and 3 to delete/close the suspect sheet opened against the petitioner.” 2 2. None represented for the Petitioner. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that there are no cases pending against the Petitioner and in view of the public interest and to safeguard the residents of the vicinity of the Petitioner, the impugned Suspect Sheet has been opened against the Petitioner. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is allowed and the impugned Suspect Sheet against the Petitioner is hereby set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:19.11.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.32209 of 2022 Dt.19.11.2025 Dinesh