Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50118 (RAJ)

MOTA URF RAMJILAL S/O SHRI RATAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15045/2025 · 2025-11-19

Vinod Kumar Bharwani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:46672] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15045/2025 Mota Urf Ramjilal S/o Shri Ratan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Goner, Police Station Shivdaspura, District Jaipur City, At Present Resident Of Tejaji Nagar, Colony, Heerawala, Police Station Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur Rural (Raj.) (At Present Accused Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15127/2025 Raju S/o Sh. Baluram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Goner, Police Station Shivdaspura District Jaipur City, Presently Residing At Tejaji Nagar Colony Heerawala Police Station Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur Rural. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Agrawal Mr. Nikhil Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Judgment 19/11/2025 The instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioners in the matter arising out of F.I.R. No.279/2022 registered at Police Station Shahpura (Jaipur Rural) District Jaipur Rural for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 382 I.P.C. [2025:RJ-JP:46672] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15045/2025] Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case, they have nothing to do with the alleged offence and they are behind the bars since 26.09.2025. The other co-accused namely Sonu @ Sonya @ Mukesh has already been granted bail by a co-ordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 09.02.2023. Trial of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude, till then, their further incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose and they are ready and willing to furnish their bail bonds. Therefore, the bail applications deserve to be allowed. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts and circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. Therefore, the bail applications are allowed. Accused- petitioners namely- (i) Mota Urf Ramjilal S/o Shri Ratan & (ii) Raju S/o Sh. Baluram shall be released on bail, if they are not required in any other case, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any [2025:RJ-JP:46672] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15045/2025] other court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when they are called upon to do so. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J Sudha/176-177