Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50118 (KAR)

SMT.SONUBAI W/O VINAYAK @ v. SMT.TARAMATI W/O IRAPPA HONGAL

RSA/100277/2020 · 2025-02-17

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD DATED THIS 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH RSA NO.100277 OF 2020 BETWEEN SMT.SONUBAI W/O VINAYAK @ VILAS KADAM AGED ABOUT: 56 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: MADARAMADDI, DHARWAD-580001 ...APPELLANT (BY SRI. SHIRAGAONAKAR R.A. ADV.) AND SMT.TARAMATI W/O IRAPPA HONGAL AGED ABOUT: 58 YEARS OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: JANATA COLONY, HANAMAGERI ONI, DHARWAD ROAD, SAVADATTI DIST: BELAGAVI …RESPONDENT RSA FILED U/SEC.100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 09.12.2019 PASSED IN R.A.NO.19/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DHARWAD, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DTD.21.01.2019, PASSED IN FDP. NO.6/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE 2 III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, DHARWAD, ALLOWING THE SUIT FILED UNDER ORDER 34 RULE 3 AND 8 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING; O R D E R Finally, three weeks9 time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the appeal shall be dismissed without reference to the Bench for non-prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE Note: As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 22.03.2025, the Advocate for the Appellant has not complied office objection. Hence, this above matter stands dismissed without reference to the Bench for non- prosecution as per the Court Order dated:17.02.2025. BY ORDER OF THE COURT Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T- By: cmu C- By: sgs