[2025:RJ-JP:46598-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 859/2025 In D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 832/2015 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3116/2005 Rakesh Pahadiya Son Of Shri Mool Chand Pahadia, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Choth Ka Barwada, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Elementary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Shri Kirhna Kunal, Secretary, Elementary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Sita Ram Jat, Director, Elementary Education, Government Of Rajasthan. Bikaner, 4. Devi Lal, District Education Officer And Additional Chief Executive Officer, Elementary Education, Zila Parishad, Sawai Madhopur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gajendra Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order 19/11/2025 1. Instant Civil Contempt Petition has been filed by and on behalf of petitioner, stating disobedience/ non-compliance of the directions issued by the Division Bench, vide judgment dated 24.05.2017, declaring decree of B.Ed. issued from the Fakrudin Ali Ahmed Teachers Training College, Darbhanga, affiliated to Lalit Narayan Mithlia University, as valid and consequently, issued [2025:RJ-JP:46598-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-859/2025] direction that “if found that the vacancies for the years in question are still available, respondents would be offer employment.” 2. On the face value, the present contempt petition, filed on 06.08.2025, is hopelessly barred by limitation. 3. Counsel for petitioner submits that in furtherance of the directions dated 24.05.2017, an appointment has been offered to one Sh. Kailash Sahay by the respondents on 24.05.2025, which give rise to a cause of action to present petitioner, to file instant contempt petition. 4. We are not convinced for accrual of cause of action to file present petition. 5. In such view of the matter, counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this contempt petition with liberty to take any alternative and appropriate legal remedy for ventilating the grievance of petitioner, if available in law. 6. Permission is granted. 7. Accordingly, the present contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. 8. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (SHUBHA MEHTA),J (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/4