Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50109 (RAJ)

VP SINGH S/O JAL SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/14571/2025 · 2025-11-24

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47410] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14571/2025 1. Vp Singh S/o Jal Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Gabdupura, Police Station Masalpur, District Karauli (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In District Jail, Karauli). 2. Mannu @ Veer Singh S/o Gabdu, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Gabdupura, Police Station Masalpur, District Karauli (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In District Jail, Karauli). 3. Jigya Singh S/o Jal Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Gabdupura, Police Station Masalpur, District Karauli (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In District Jail, Karauli). ----Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta For State For complainant : : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Mitol Jain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 24/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicants. The accused-applicants were arrested in connection with FIR No. 130/2025 registered at Police Station Masalpur District Karauli for the offence(s) under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 125, 329(3) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants has submitted that cross FIRs by the parties have been registered in the instant matter. It is submitted that physical altercation between several persons of the same family has occurred on [2025:RJ-JP:47410] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-14571/2025] account of property dispute, situated on the piece of government land. It is further submitted that there are total of three medical reports, reflecting the nature of injury sustained by Hansraj, which is initially prescribed as grievance in nature. It is further submitted that the nature of injury has changed in the second report and the same is then reflected as simple in nature and finally upon perusal of the X-ray report, the nature of injury has been reflected as life threatening in the third injury report. Furthermore, it is submitted that the applicants are in custody ever since 26.09.2025 and charge-sheet has already been filed. It is also submitted that criminal antecedents registered against the applicant No.1, namely V.P. Singh S/o Jal Singh, pertains to the year 2011 and the same is not pending as on date. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the instant bail application and have submitted that there are strong criminal antecedents of similar nature are registered against all the applicants. It is further submitted that physical altercation, in premeditated and organized manner, occurred between the parties, wherein the accused-applicants were equipped with lathi and farsa out of which lathi has already been recovered. Moreover, it is submitted the allegations levelled against the applicants are of heinous and grave nature and the final medical opinion is also reflective of the life threatening injuries sustained by Hansraj. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the there are strong criminal antecedents are registered against the accused- applicants; that as per final medical opinion, injuries are life [2025:RJ-JP:47410] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-14571/2025] threatening and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is not inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicants. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is dismissed at this stage. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja/131