APHC010257722020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 16973/2020 Between: 1. C. BHASKAR REDDY,, S/O. SRI CHOWDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC - BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO. 8-1-405/A/68, YSR NEST, DREAM VALLEY, SHAIKPET, GOLCONDA, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA-500 008. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT AT ANANTHAPUR. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PENUKONDA, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, HINDUPUR REVENUE MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G RAMA MANOJA 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.16973 of 2020 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 HBKM,J W.P.No.16973 of 2020 The Court made the following Order: No representation for the petitioner. Heard the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents particularly the 4th respondent in attempting to dispossess from the lawful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner’s agricultural land admeasuring Ac.0-96 Cents in Sy.No.41/1 of Kotipi Village, Penugonda, Hindupur Revenue Mandal, Ananthapur District for the purpose of assigning house site plots in it under the scheme <Navaratnalu-Pedalandariki Illu=, without issuing any notice, without giving any opportunity of hearing and without passing any order. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the counter affidavit of the 4th respondent submits that the subject land was already acquired vide proceedings of the then Revenue Divisional Officer, Penukonda dated 24.07.2008 and the petitioner was paid compensation to it and the subject land was utilized for the welfare scheme of housing. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 HBKM,J W.P.No.16973 of 2020 As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 24.09.2025 PGT