Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50101 (PAT)

Ranjit Yadav @ Chhanu Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./41431/2025 · 2025-08-29

Satyavrat Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41431 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-382 Year-2024 Thana- BAHERA District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Ranjit Yadav @ Chhanu Yadav S/O Siya Yadav R/Village- Trimuhani, P.S- Bahera, Distt.- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satya Nand Shukla ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 3 29-08-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 351(2), 352, 132, 121(1), 121(2), 74, 109, 125B, 191(2) of the B.N.S. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of one case under the Excise Act and is in custody since 02.03.2025 and the informant alleges that petitioner was apprehended based on trap in a case of liquor, but crowd gathered and attacked the force with lathi, danda, stone, bamboo etc. and even misbehaved with Puja who was video-graphing the occurrence, thereafter accused persons snatched the seized liquor from the constable Chandan and also took out liquor from the dickey of the motorcycle and freed the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41431 of 2025(3) dt.29-08-2025 2/2 petitioner. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that the date of occurrence is 06.10.2024 and the FIR came to be instituted on 08.10.2024 i.e. after a delay of two days. It is also submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the trial to prove his innocence. 5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Benipur, Darbhanga in connection with Bahera P. S. Case No.382 of 2024. 7. The application stands allowed. vikash/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T