Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50100 (RAJ)

SMT. VIMLA BHATIA W/O LATE SHRI JAI RAM BHAITIA v. SHRI MEGHRAJ S/O SHRI KUNDAN MAL

CW/14645/2025 · 2025-10-06

Maneesh Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:40419] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14645/2025 Smt. Vimla Bhatia W/o Late Shri Jai Ram Bhatia, aged about 70 Years, R/o 367/16, Kavandaspura, Madaar Gate, Ajmer ----Petitioner/Landlord/Applicant Versus Shri Meghraj S/o Shri Kundan Mal, C/o Sunil Tea Company 367/16 Kavandaspura, Madaar Gate, Ajmer and R/o M-51A Aanasagar Link Road Ajmer. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohit Gupta For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 06/10/2025 1. By way of filing this writ petition, a prayer has been made for issuing directions to the Rent Tribunal, Ajmer to decide the Rent Case No.21/2024 CIS No.47/2024 titled as Smt. Vimla Bhatia Vs. Meghraj within a period of six months. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a widow lady, senior citizen aged about 70 years and suffering from High Blood Pressure, Diabetes, Asthma, as well as Neurological and Cardiological ailments. He further submits that the petitioner has filed an application under Section 9 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 for eviction of the respondents on the grounds of bona fide necessity and material alteration. Counsel also submits that the said eviction petition is pending for adjudication before the learned Rent Tribunal, Ajmer. Therefore, direction may be issued to the learned Tribunal to decide the said [2025:RJ-JP:40419] (2 of 2) [CW-14645/2025] eviction petition expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months. 3. Heard and considered the submissions made at bar and perused the material available on record. 4. Normally, the direction to the Sub-ordinate Court to decide the matter in a time bound manner ought not to have been granted, but while considering the peculiar facts of the case, more particularly, that the petitioner is a senior citizen of 70 years, a widow lady and suffering from High Blood Pressure, Diabetes, Asthma, as well as Neurological and Cardiological ailments; and further that the eviction petition is based upon her bona fide necessities, it is expected from the learned Rent Tribunal to make all possible endeavours to decide the pending eviction petition expeditiously. 5. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV /5