APHC010641882022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 38354/2022 Between: 1. CHENNAMPALLI KULLAYAMMA, W/O. KOTAPPA, AGED 37 YEARS, D.NO. 11-1-834, KRUPANANDA NAGAR, ANANTHAPURAM TOWN, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, A. P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAM DIST, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE S H O, II TOWN, ANANATHAPURAM DIST, ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not initiating any action on the representation of the petitioner, dated 7.11.2022, for providing protection as mandated under Sec 15 (A) (8) (c) of SC and ST Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989 is as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and also violations of Article 14,16,19 and 300- A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 7.11.2022 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. JADA SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: <.... to issue a Writ Order or direction particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not initiating any action on the representation of the petitioner, dated 7.11.2022, for providing protection as mandated under Sec 15 (A) (8) (c) of SC and ST Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989 is as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and also violations of Articles 14,16,19 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 7.11.2022 and pass ...= At the time of hearing, Sri Sanke Santhosh, learned counsel representing Sri Jada Sravan Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioner on record would submit that this Court by Order dated 06.12.2022 directed respondent No.2 to consider and shall pass orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 07.11.2022 within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on instructions would submit that after completion of investigation, Police filed Charge Sheet which is numbered as SC. Spl.54 of 2023 on the file of the Court of District Judge, Ananthapuramu and now the matter is at the stage of framing of charges. In that view, it is apposite to direct respondent No.2 to take necessary steps to protect the life and liberty of the Petitioner, who is a victim till disposal of the matter before the Trial Court, according to law. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 38354 of 2022 19.11.2025 Mjl /*