Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition No. 1063 of 2025 (M/S)
Chandra Shekhar Joshi
….......Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and another …..... Respondents
Present : Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State/respondents.
JUDGMENT
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
By means of the instant petition, the petitioner claims that he is in possession of a land, plot No.245/3 admeasuring 0.632 Hectare, situated in Village Savaldeh, Tehsil Ramnagar, District Nainital for a long time. As per Government Policy, the land should be regularized in his favour, but it is not being done despite multiple representations given by the petitioner.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the decision is to be taken by the respondent no.2/the Collector Nainital, but he has been reporting the matter to the respondent no.1/State and last communication was made by the respondent no.2 on 25.01.2023 (Annexure No.12). He would submit that the respondents may be directed to take a decision in the matter, in view of the Government Policy.
4.
Learned State counsel gives statement that the decision may be taken in the matter within a period of two months from today.
2
5.
The Court takes on record the statement given by the learned State counsel.
6.
The writ petition stands disposed of with the direction to the respondents to take a decision in the matter within a period of two months from today.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.)
24.04.2025 Sanjay