Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50079 (ALL)

LAKHAN LAL v. STATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

WRIA/5585/2025 · 2025-05-19

Ajay Bhanot

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:84847 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5585 of 2025 Petitioner :- Lakhan Lal Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Bharti Counsel for Respondent :- Alok Kumar Srivastava,C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Shri Alok Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent submits that the representation of the petitioner has been decided. The cause of action on which the writ petition was founded does not survive. Faced with this Shri Rakesh Kumar Bharti, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the prayer sought in the writ petition but recasts his relief. The only prayer made by Shri Rakesh Kumar Bharti, learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner may be granted leave to assail the order rejecting his claim before the competent court. It is always open to the petitioner to seek his remedy against the order rejecting his representation as per law. In wake of the aforesaid the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 20.5.2025 Dhananjai Digitally signed by :- DHANANJAI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad